<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>research on W4LKER</title><link>http://walker.eco.br/tags/research/</link><description>Recent content in research on W4LKER</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>pt-BR</language><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. W. de Barros Dantas Paniágua. 2025</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 17:19:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://walker.eco.br/tags/research/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>oDEIO o dono da perplexity, mas...</title><link>http://walker.eco.br/notas/bsky-20250215-odeio-o-dono-da-perplexity-mas/</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 17:19:23 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://walker.eco.br/notas/bsky-20250215-odeio-o-dono-da-perplexity-mas/</guid><description>oDEIO o dono da perplexity, mas eles liberaram o deep research deles de graça, e testei agora. O cara do perplexity recentemente disse que a wikipedia seria substituida por eles. maldito. mas comparando com, o deep research do gemini, pareceu bem superior (nao tive acesso ao deep research do openai)</description></item></channel></rss>