criado em:

• 03-05-2025
• 12:08 relacionados:
• notas:

1. deep research chat gpt - Ânsia de partir, uma ilusão masculina
2. deep research PERPLEXITY - Ânsia de partir, uma ilusão masculina

• tags:
• Fontes & Links:

Gender, Departure, and Adventure: Examining the Masculine Privilege of “Leaving It All Behind”

I. Introduction

The narrative archetype of “leaving it all behind”—departing from the familiar confines of home, work, and responsibility to embark on a journey of adventure and self-discovery—holds a powerful and enduring place in cultural imagination. From ancient epics chronicling heroic voyages to modern tales of wilderness treks and road trips, this theme resonates with deep-seated human desires for freedom, transformation, and escape from the mundane. Historically, however, access to and celebration of such departures have been markedly asymmetrical along gender lines. The freedom to roam, to take risks, and to shed responsibilities has been constructed and represented predominantly as a masculine prerogative, while women have often been tethered to the domestic sphere, cast in roles of waiting, maintaining, or facing censure for seeking similar forms of mobility and adventure.

This research report undertakes a comprehensive academic analysis of these gendered dimensions of departure and adventure. It investigates the pervasive cultural and literary patterns that associate masculinity with mobility and transcendence, and femininity with stasis and immanence. The central research problem lies in this asymmetry: the cultural valorization of male departure often contrasts sharply with the constraints, dangers, or moral condemnation faced by women who attempt analogous journeys, particularly when caregiving responsibilities are involved.1 This disparity points towards a form of masculine privilege embedded within the very narratives of freedom and exploration that shape Western culture.

This paper argues that the narrative of “leaving it all behind” is deeply gendered, historically privileging male transcendence and mobility while confining women to immanence and domesticity. However, this binary is increasingly challenged by female authors and protagonists, evolving social norms, and technological shifts, although significant inequalities persist, shaped by intersectional factors and the complex interplay between social construction and individual psychology. The analysis will demonstrate that achieving equitable freedom of movement requires deconstructing these gendered narratives and ethical frameworks surrounding responsibility and care.

To develop this argument, the report employs an interdisciplinary approach, drawing insights from literary studies, feminist theory, mobility studies, sociology, psychology, and ethics. It begins by establishing a theoretical framework grounded in feminist critiques of domesticity and mobility studies concepts. It then traces the historical evolution of gendered adventure narratives through analyses of key literary texts from different periods. Subsequent sections critically examine the biological versus social explanations for gender differences in adventure-seeking; analyze female-authored narratives that challenge or subvert the male tradition; explore how intersectional factors like race, class, sexuality, and disability shape experiences of mobility; delve into the ethical complexities of departure versus care; assess the impact of contemporary technological and social transformations; and consider the underlying psychological functions of escape and adventure. The report concludes by synthesizing these findings and reflecting on their implications for gender equality and future cultural transformation.

II. Theoretical Framework and Literature Review

Understanding the gendered nature of adventure and departure requires engaging with theoretical frameworks that analyze the relationship between gender, space, mobility, and representation. Feminist theory, particularly feminist geography and literary criticism, provides crucial tools for critiquing the historical association of women with domesticity and immobility. Concurrently, the field of mobility studies offers concepts for analyzing movement not just as physical displacement but as a socially and culturally imbued practice shaped by power relations.

Feminist Critiques: Domesticity, Mobility, and Power

Feminist scholarship has long interrogated the gendered division of labor and the ideological separation of the public sphere (historically coded male, associated with work, politics, and mobility) from the private sphere (coded female, associated with home, family, and confinement).3 This division, originating in social movements like second-wave feminism, critiques women’s unequal access to the labor market and public life, seeing it as a pattern of patriarchal oppression.3 This spatial and social segregation profoundly shapes mobility patterns. Research consistently shows that women’s travel behavior differs from men’s, often involving shorter distances, more complex trip-chaining to accommodate household and care responsibilities, and greater reliance on public transport, contrasting with the simpler, work-focused commute often assumed as the norm in traditional transport planning.3

Consequently, mobility itself becomes a critical site of feminist analysis and struggle. Scholars argue that gender and mobility are inseparable, influencing each other in profound ways.4 For women historically confined by decorous middle-class expectations or domestic duties, mobility—whether achieved through cycling, as Frances Willard described, or other means—represents more than just movement; it signifies empowerment, confidence, expanded possibilities, and a reclaiming of agency.4 Increased mobility allows women to challenge spatial constraints, access education and employment, and participate more fully in public life, potentially disrupting traditional gender norms and power structures.4

Feminist literary criticism extends this spatial analysis to the realm of representation. It examines how domestic spaces, particularly in genres like the Female Fantastic or Gothic literature, are often depicted as sites of female confinement, oppression, and psychological distress, mirroring patriarchal constraints.5 The recurring motif of the haunted house, for instance, can be read as a metaphor for the ways women have been historically invisibilized and trapped within domestic ideology.5 However, these literary spaces can also become sites of subversion, where the irruption of the supernatural challenges patriarchal order and gives voice to repressed female experiences.5 This critical lens highlights how literature both reflects and shapes societal understandings of gendered space and confinement.

Mobility Studies: Movement, Meaning, and Inequality

The “mobility turn” in the social sciences, spearheaded by theorists like Tim Cresswell, Mimi Sheller, and John Urry, offers a complementary framework.7 This paradigm challenges “sedentarist metaphysics”—the assumption that stability and place are the norm—and instead focuses on movement, circulation, and flow as central to social life.7 Urry identifies five interdependent “mobilities”: the corporeal travel of people, the physical movement of objects, imaginative travel through media, virtual travel online, and communicative travel via messages.9

Crucially, mobility studies defines mobility not merely as physical motion, but as movement imbued with meaning, shaped by power, and experienced differently by different individuals.7 It encompasses observable movement, the meanings encoded in that movement (often through narrative and discourse), the practice of moving, and the potential for movement (motility).9 Each of these aspects is demonstrably gendered. How people move (where, when, how often) differs by gender, often reproducing power hierarchies.9 Narratives and representations consistently code masculinity as mobile and active, while femininity is associated with relative stasis and passivity 9, as exemplified by Bourdieu’s analysis of the confident, determined masculine gait versus a hesitant, indecisive one.9

While mobility is often culturally associated with positive values like freedom, progress, and modernity, critical mobility studies emphasize its dual nature, acknowledging that it also entails restriction, surveillance, and control.7 Mobility is not a universal good or an equally accessible resource; it is profoundly unequal, shaped by political-economic processes, nationality, class, race, and gender.7 The ability to “leave it all behind” is often a marker of privilege, unavailable to those constrained by poverty, borders, or social status.

Integrating Frameworks for Analysis

Positioning this research at the nexus of feminist theory and mobility studies allows for a richer understanding of gendered adventure narratives. Combining these perspectives enables an analysis that considers how gender shapes not only the physical possibilities of movement but also the cultural meanings assigned to it, the ways it is represented in literature and media, and the power dynamics embedded within it. This integrated approach moves beyond simply noting differences in male and female mobility patterns to exploring how these patterns are produced, experienced, represented, and contested.

It becomes clear that a tension exists within these theoretical framings. Feminist critiques often valorize mobility as a necessary escape from patriarchal confinement 4, while critical mobility studies caution against equating mobility with freedom, highlighting its inherent inequalities and constraints.7 The “freedom” offered by departure, therefore, must be examined critically, recognizing that it is often predicated on specific forms of privilege. Furthermore, the cultural coding of masculinity with active mobility and femininity with passive stasis 9 operates not just as a description but as a powerful social prescription. This ideology shapes expectations, influences behavior, limits opportunities, and underpins the very infrastructure of movement, demanding a critical deconstruction of how these norms are produced and maintained. This paper navigates these complexities by examining both the liberating potential and the inherent inequalities associated with the gendered trope of “leaving it all behind.”

III. Historical and Literary Analysis

The cultural narrative associating adventure and departure with masculinity while linking femininity to domesticity and stasis has deep historical roots, evident in foundational literary texts and evolving through subsequent eras. Examining canonical works like Homer’s Odyssey, Herman Melville’s Moby Dick, and Jack Kerouac’s On the Road reveals both the persistence of this gendered structure and shifts in its manifestation across different historical and cultural contexts.

Classical Foundations: The Odyssey

Homer’s Odyssey stands as a cornerstone of the Western adventure narrative, establishing enduring tropes of male mobility and female immobility. Odysseus’s ten-year journey home is the archetypal male quest: a departure from home and family, fraught with external dangers (monsters, gods, temptations), navigated through a combination of heroic strength and metis (cunning intelligence), culminating in his return, violent restoration of patriarchal authority, and reunion with his patiently waiting wife, Penelope.10 Penelope’s narrative, in stark contrast, is defined by her twenty-year confinement within the domestic space of the palace in Ithaca. While she demonstrates significant agency through her cleverness (e.g., the weaving/unweaving of Laertes’ shroud) and loyalty in fending off the suitors, her story is fundamentally one of waiting, endurance, and fidelity to her absent husband.11 Her immobility provides the stable anchor against which Odysseus’s heroic mobility is defined.

The epic carefully delineates gender roles and expectations. Masculine honor is associated with leadership, guardianship, and crucially, restraint—controlling the “excessively manly spirit” (thumos agênôr) that leads to rashness.13 Odysseus himself embodies a complex masculinity, forced by mortal limitations to employ both traditionally “male” methods (strength, warfare, as at Troy) and “female” methods (deceit, disguise, cunning, as with the Cyclops or Circe) to survive his trials.10 Unlike the goddess Athena, who freely balances male and female attributes, Odysseus’s use of metis is often a necessity born of vulnerability, and his moments of masculine pride (like revealing his name to Polyphemus) often lead to peril, suggesting that female trickery can be more liberating than brute force in his adventures.10 Upon returning to Ithaca, however, he must reclaim his male roles (king, husband, father) primarily through masculine displays of skill (stringing the bow) and violence (killing the suitors).10

Female characters are often polarized. Penelope represents the idealized wife: loyal, clever within domestic bounds, and devoted.11 Her virtue is explicitly contrasted with figures like Clytemnestra or the disloyal maids, who represent betrayal and danger.11 Other powerful female figures encountered by Odysseus—Circe, Calypso, the Sirens—are frequently depicted as obstacles, enchantresses whose power (often linked to weaving or song) threatens to derail the male hero’s journey and keep him from his proper domestic sphere.11 Even Penelope, despite her virtues, faces social displacement due to Odysseus’s absence and Telemachus’s assertion of masculine authority, highlighting her precarious position within the patriarchal structure.14 Her resistance often takes the form of subtle maneuvering and intellectual depth (periphron), challenging the dominant “mythos of masculinity” focused on heroic action.14 The epic ultimately reinforces a patriarchal order where male adventure is central and female roles are largely defined in relation to men and the maintenance of the household, even while acknowledging female intelligence and resilience within those confines.

Nineteenth-Century Masculinity Afloat: Moby Dick

Herman Melville’s Moby Dick (1851) transports the adventure narrative to the industrializing, expansionist world of nineteenth-century America, locating it within the intensely masculine sphere of a whaling ship. Ishmael’s famous opening lines signal a departure not just geographically but psychologically, an escape from the “hypos” and constraints of land-based society into the vast, ambiguous space of the sea and the all-male community of the Pequod.15 The ship itself becomes a crucial “lived space” where gender is performed and negotiated, largely in the absence of women and traditional domesticity.16

The novel explores themes of masculinity through the lens of this isolated, homosocial environment. It examines intense male bonding, hierarchical power structures (with Ahab as the dominating force), and the potential for both camaraderie and conflict.15 Some critics interpret the relationships, particularly between Ishmael and Queequeg, through a homoerotic lens, while others emphasize homosociality and the human need for acceptance.15 The obsessive, vengeful quest of Captain Ahab can be read as a critique of a “pathological type of masculinity”—a monomaniacal focus on conquest and dominance, potentially linked to the prevailing ideologies of capitalism and imperialism.16 Ahab’s drive to assert mastery over the whale, a powerful symbol of nature and potentially the feminine Other, reflects a destructive impulse inherent in this form of hegemonic masculinity.17

While focused on a male world, Melville’s work may also implicitly critique the rigid gender roles of the era, particularly the exclusion of men from domestic spaces and labors, which Melville might have seen as limiting the formation of viable male identities.16 The Pequod, though seemingly the epitome of a masculine space, is presented with underlying ambiguities.16 The narrative structure, centered on male departure and quest, inherently marginalizes or excludes the feminine and the domestic, reinforcing the idea that this form of masculine adventure requires a separation from that sphere.

Twentieth-Century Restlessness: On the Road

Jack Kerouac’s On the Road (1957, based on earlier drafts) offers a mid-twentieth-century reimagining of the departure narrative, channeling postwar anxieties and counter-cultural impulses into a restless, episodic journey across America. Sal Paradise and Dean Moriarty represent a generation seeking escape from the perceived conformity, materialism, and domesticity of postwar suburban life.18 Their frantic movement is a quest for “IT”—an elusive state of authenticity, intense experience, and transcendence, pursued through jazz, drugs, sex, and perpetual motion.19 The road and the automobile become potent symbols of freedom and masculine camaraderie, spaces where social norms can be transgressed.18

However, the novel’s portrayal of gender is deeply problematic and has drawn significant critique. The freedom sought by the male protagonists often comes at the expense of the women in their lives, who are frequently depicted as anchors of the dreaded domesticity, obstacles to male freedom, sexual conveniences, or figures to be abandoned.18 The narrative reflects a Beat generation ethos that sometimes framed emancipation from women, rather than for them, seeing them as domesticators threatening male autonomy.20 Dean Moriarty’s character, in particular, embodies a form of “gender trouble,” his irresponsibility and psychological abuse of women presented as potentially stemming from deep-seated insecurities.19 While celebrating rebellion, the novel itself contains elements of self-critique, acknowledging the characters’ irresponsibility and the potential emptiness or futility of their endless quest.18 Their escape is often into a romanticized, nostalgic vision of masculinity, drawing on archetypes like the frontiersman, which ultimately proves unstable and insufficient in the face of postwar realities.18

Synthesis: Persistent Structures, Evolving Forms

Across these diverse literary landscapes—from ancient Greece to antebellum whaling ships to postwar highways—a persistent structure emerges: male protagonists achieve freedom, identity, or adventure through mobility and departure, while female characters are often associated with immobility, domesticity, and the roles of waiting or being left behind. This structure remains remarkably stable even as the specific goals and nature of the male quest evolve: Odysseus seeks homecoming and restoration, Ahab seeks vengeance and conquest, Sal and Dean seek subjective experience and escape.

A crucial element sustaining this structure is the narrative necessity of marginalizing or instrumentalizing the feminine and the domestic sphere to enable male transcendence. Penelope’s confinement provides the rationale for Odysseus’s return; the absence of women on the Pequod allows for the exploration of a particular form of masculinity; the women in On the Road often represent the very stability the men are fleeing. This suggests a deeply embedded cultural script where male self-discovery is predicated on leaving women and the domestic realm behind. The following table summarizes key aspects of these male-centric narratives, setting the stage for examining how female authors and protagonists later challenge this tradition.

Table 1: Evolution of Gendered Adventure Narratives (Part 1: Male Protagonists)

IV. Biological and Social Dimensions

The persistent association of adventure and risk-taking with masculinity raises the complex question of causality: are observed gender differences rooted in biology (“nature”) or shaped primarily by social conditioning and structural inequalities (“nurture”)? Scientific research offers conflicting evidence, while critical perspectives caution against simplistic biological determinism, emphasizing the powerful role of social construction.

Evaluating Biological Arguments for Gender Differences

Research utilizing self-report measures like Zuckerman’s Sensation Seeking Scale (SSS-V) has often found that, on average, men score higher than women on the total scale and on subscales related to Thrill and Adventure Seeking (TAS), Disinhibition (Dis), and Boredom Susceptibility (BS).22 Effect sizes for these differences are typically moderate (d ≈ 0.4 to 0.5).22 No significant difference is usually found on the Experience Seeking (ES) subscale, which assesses openness to non-risky experiences.22 Some evolutionary psychology theories propose that these differences stem from divergent selection pressures, favoring riskier strategies in males for competition over resources or mates.22 Potential links to physiological factors like testosterone have been investigated, though findings are inconsistent.22 Furthermore, studies suggest males tend to engage in riskier behaviors than females across various domains 23, and that incidental anger is more likely to drive risky decision-making in males.24 Psychological factors, such as women exhibiting greater loss aversion (sensitivity to potential losses) and men displaying higher optimism (particularly financial optimism), have also been proposed to explain differences in willingness to take risks.25

However, the evidence for innate biological differences driving adventure-seeking is far from conclusive and requires critical scrutiny. Some studies using behavioral tasks find no significant sex differences in risky decision-making.23 Even where differences are found, the effect sizes are often moderate, indicating substantial overlap between male and female distributions.22 Crucially, the observed sex difference in Thrill and Adventure Seeking (TAS) scores has significantly declined over the past few decades, primarily due to a reduction in men’s scores.22 This temporal shift strongly suggests the influence of changing social norms or cultural factors rather than fixed biology, supporting arguments about the mutability of such traits.22

Critiquing Biological Determinism

Biological determinism—the idea that human behavior and social structures are primarily dictated by innate biological factors like genes or hormones—has faced significant criticism on both scientific and philosophical grounds.27 Critics argue that deterministic explanations are often reductionist, simplifying complex phenomena, and essentialist, attributing traits to fixed biological characteristics while underestimating the profound influence of environment, culture, and learning.28 Such arguments have historically been used to justify social inequalities based on gender, race, and class, often correlating with periods of political retrenchment and reduced support for social programs.26

The search for genes linked to complex behaviors like risk-taking or adventure-seeking is fraught with methodological challenges and potential biases.27 Critics contend that behavior genetics sometimes avoids deeper conceptual analysis, burying critiques under repetitive results without resolving fundamental epistemological issues.27 Furthermore, the emphasis on finding differences between groups (like genders) can obscure the vast similarities and the significant within-group variation.26 While acknowledging the undeniable role of biology in all human development and behavior 27, critics reject the notion that biology rigidly prescribes destiny, emphasizing instead the plasticity and responsiveness of human traits to environmental and social inputs.28 Gender identity itself is increasingly understood as a complex, multifactorial trait influenced by innate factors but not solely determined by them.29

The Social Construction of Gendered Mobility and Risk

A social constructionist perspective views gender not as a fixed biological category but as a dynamic social and structural variable encompassing identity, expression, roles, norms, and power relations.30 From this viewpoint, differences in mobility and risk-taking are largely shaped by societal expectations and structures. Gender stereotypes play a crucial role. Prescriptive stereotypes dictate how men and women should behave (e.g., men should be adventurous, women should be cautious), while descriptive stereotypes make claims about their inherent capabilities (e.g., men are better risk-takers, women are less competent under uncertainty).32

These stereotypes directly impact risk-taking behavior. Risk-taking is often less socially rewarded and potentially more penalized for women, as it may violate prescriptive norms of femininity and trigger descriptive biases regarding competence, especially under conditions of uncertainty inherent in adventure.32 Consequently, women may rationally choose to take fewer risks, or institutional gatekeepers may offer them fewer opportunities to do so.32 This creates a cycle of “gendered mobility,” where men, by taking more risks (or being perceived as doing so), accrue more opportunities for the large rewards associated with successful risk-taking, contributing to their disproportionate representation in leadership positions and reinforcing gender inequality.32

Interaction and Synthesis: Beyond Nature vs. Nurture

Ultimately, attributing gender differences in adventure-seeking solely to either biology or social construction is an oversimplification. The evidence points towards a complex interplay between potential (likely small and overlapping) biological predispositions, powerful processes of socialization, pervasive gender stereotypes, unequal opportunity structures, and biased systems of evaluation. The scientific debate itself, often framed around the search for difference, risks reinforcing the very gender binary it aims to explain, potentially overlooking the vast similarities between men and women and the fluidity of gender itself. The documented decline in the gender gap for Thrill and Adventure Seeking 22 serves as compelling evidence for the significant role of social and cultural factors in modulating behaviors often assumed to be biologically rooted. A nuanced understanding requires acknowledging the biological context without falling into determinism, while simultaneously recognizing the profound power of social structures and cultural norms in shaping who gets to “leave it all behind” and how such departures are perceived.

Table 2: Biological vs. Social Influences on Adventure-Seeking Traits

V. Female Agency and Narrative

In response to the long tradition of male-dominated adventure narratives, recent decades have witnessed the emergence and popularization of female-authored accounts of journeying, exploration, and endurance. These narratives often reclaim the tropes of adventure—solitude, physical challenge, encounters with the unknown—but reframe them through a female lens, frequently focusing on internal transformation, healing, and the assertion of agency against societal expectations. Analyzing works like Cheryl Strayed’s Wild and Robyn Davidson’s Tracks reveals distinctive features and tensions within female-centered adventure stories.

Case Study 1: Healing on the Trail – Cheryl Strayed’s Wild

Cheryl Strayed’s memoir Wild: From Lost to Found on the Pacific Crest Trail (2012) chronicles her impulsive decision to hike over a thousand miles of the PCT following a period of profound personal crisis: the death of her mother, the dissolution of her marriage, and struggles with addiction.33 Her journey is explicitly framed not as a conquest of nature but as an arduous pilgrimage towards healing and self-rediscovery. Lacking prior long-distance hiking experience, Strayed confronts the immense physical challenges of the trail—pain, exhaustion, injury—alongside her emotional and psychological burdens.33

The narrative emphasizes the restorative power of walking and immersion in the wilderness. The sheer physicality of the trek forces a confrontation with her body and its limits, ultimately leading to increased strength and resilience.34 The slowness and repetitiveness of hiking foster reflection, allowing her to process grief and past trauma.34 Solitude, initially daunting for a lone woman in the wilderness, becomes a crucial element of her journey, enabling introspection and self-reliance.34 Strayed’s encounters with other hikers highlight both potential dangers (implicit or explicit threats perceived due to her gender) and moments of connection and support. While some critical analyses might point to the potential for scopophilia or the “to-be-looked-at-ness” that can persist even in feminist narratives focusing on the female body and experience 35, the overwhelming focus of Wild remains on Strayed’s internal landscape, her agency in undertaking the challenge, and the transformative, healing power of the journey itself.33 The narrative resonates strongly with readers, particularly women, offering a sense of empowerment and solidarity in undertaking solo adventures.33

Case Study 2: Defying Norms in the Outback – Robyn Davidson’s Tracks

Published decades earlier, Robyn Davidson’s Tracks (1980) recounts her extraordinary solo journey across 1700 miles of the Australian desert with four camels and her dog, Diggity.36 Undertaken in the late 1970s, amidst the rise of second-wave feminism in Australia, Davidson’s trek was a radical act of defiance against the deeply ingrained sexism and restrictive gender roles of the time.36 Her motivation stemmed partly from a dissatisfaction with modern superficiality but also from a desire to test her own limits and reject the passive, “door-mattish” femininity she felt society imposed.37

Tracks vividly portrays the challenges of female solitude and independence in a hostile environment, both natural and social. In Alice Springs, preparing for her trip, Davidson confronts blatant misogyny and warnings of sexual violence, making her feel threatened and questioning her choices.38 Her identity as a woman shapes how her journey is perceived, turning her into the “camel lady”—a media sensation, an object of ridicule for sexists, and eventually a “mythical being” who has done something extraordinary.37 Davidson resists this mythologizing, insisting that her journey demonstrates that “anyone could do anything”.38 The solitude of the desert becomes a space for profound self-reflection, allowing her to deconstruct societal gender norms and her own internalized feelings of “self-worthlessness”.38 Encounters with Aboriginal communities, particularly the respect and power held by Aboriginal women, offer a stark contrast to the sexism of white Australian society and underscore the socially constructed nature of gender roles.37 Her journey is thus not only a physical feat but also a powerful feminist statement about female capability, resilience, and the possibility of redefining womanhood outside patriarchal constraints.37

Comparing Female Narratives: Interior Landscapes and Political Acts

Comparing Wild and Tracks reveals common threads in contemporary female adventure narratives. Both emphasize the journey as a process of internal transformation—healing from trauma (Strayed) or shedding societal conditioning (Davidson). Solitude is central, providing space for introspection and the development of self-reliance. Both narratives frankly address the specific fears and vulnerabilities faced by women traveling alone, yet ultimately frame the experience as empowering. Physical endurance is intrinsically linked to psychological strength and resilience.

These narratives differ significantly from the male-centric tradition exemplified by The Odyssey, Moby Dick, or On the Road. The focus often shifts from conquering external foes or escaping societal bonds towards navigating internal landscapes, healing psychological wounds, and asserting agency within or against constraining social structures. While male narratives often depict departure as a flight from responsibility, these female journeys can be interpreted as acts of responsibility—towards the self. They represent a reclaiming of the right to pursue self-discovery and transcendence, often in order to re-engage with the world from a position of greater strength and authenticity.

This reframing is significant. Because society historically restricts female mobility and associates women with domesticity, the very act of a woman undertaking a challenging solo journey becomes inherently political. Davidson’s awareness of being a “symbol” 37 and the resonance of Strayed’s story for other women adventurers 33 illustrate this. Their personal quests inevitably challenge broader gender norms, turning individual acts of departure and endurance into implicit critiques of patriarchal limitations. The adventure is not just personal; it carries symbolic weight, demonstrating female capability and demanding a re-evaluation of who has the right to explore, to risk, and to define their own path.

Table 1: Evolution of Gendered Adventure Narratives (Part 2: Female Protagonists)

VI. Intersectional Perspectives

While the contrast between historically privileged male mobility and constrained female mobility provides a crucial starting point, a deeper understanding requires an intersectional lens. Gender does not operate in isolation; its influence on the possibilities and experiences of “leaving it all behind” is profoundly shaped by intersecting factors such as race, class, sexuality, and disability.9 Kimberlé Crenshaw’s concept of intersectionality highlights how overlapping systems of oppression create unique matrices of disadvantage and privilege, meaning that the “freedom to depart” is experienced vastly differently depending on one’s position within these intersecting social hierarchies.39

Race, Gender, and the Politics of Mobility

The dominant narratives of adventure, even those featuring women, often center white experiences. Black feminist geography and historical analysis challenge the erasure of Black women’s mobility and agency.41 Examining historical narratives like that of Nancy Prince, a 19th-century African American woman who traveled extensively, reveals complexities often missed in generalized accounts.42 Prince’s narrative distinguishes between a “mobility of poverty,” driven by economic necessity and displacement (rooted in legacies of slavery), and a “mobility of agency,” where travel becomes a means of asserting individuality and pursuing work (like missionary activities or lecturing) within specific institutional structures.42 Similarly, analysis of The Bantu World newspaper from 1935 shows educated Black South African women undertaking travel for professional, educational, and even leisure purposes, actively challenging the narrative of subjugation and immobility imposed by the segregationist regime.41 Their journeys represented acts of political defiance and assertions of cosmopolitanism.

These experiences contrast sharply with the often-privileged mobility depicted in narratives like Elizabeth Gilbert’s Eat Pray Love 43 or the experiences of contemporary digital nomads. Studies reveal that Asian female digital nomads, for instance, navigate spaces where their mobility is constrained by racialized and sexualized stereotypes, encountering prejudice and harassment that differ significantly from the experiences of their white, often male, counterparts who benefit from passport privilege and favorable perceptions.44 Mobility, therefore, is not a uniform experience of freedom but is deeply mediated by racial hierarchies and colonial legacies.43

Class, Gender, and the Means to Depart

Socioeconomic class is a fundamental determinant of who can afford to “leave it all behind.” Many celebrated adventure narratives, both male and female, rely on significant financial resources or social capital. Funding Strayed’s months-long hike on the PCT, Davidson’s extensive preparations and camel acquisition for her trek, or the lifestyle of digital nomads often requires a level of economic privilege.44 Digital nomadism, in particular, is frequently critiqued as a lifestyle accessible primarily to privileged Westerners who leverage global economic inequalities (geo-arbitrage) to fund their travels, sometimes with little regard for their impact on local communities.44 This privileged mobility stands in stark contrast to the “mobility of poverty” experienced by those forced to move due to economic hardship or displacement.42 Examining the intersection of gender, race, and class reveals the compounded disadvantages faced by low-income women, particularly women of color or those with disabilities, whose opportunities for adventurous departure are severely limited by material constraints and systemic barriers.39

Sexuality, Gender, and Escaping Normativity

For LGBTQ+ individuals, travel and departure can function as crucial strategies for escaping heteronormative and homophobic environments, seeking accepting communities, and exploring or affirming their identities.47 Queer travel narratives often depict journeys not just as physical movement but as processes of self-discovery and resistance against societal pressures.48 As seen in Andrew Sean Greer’s Less, travel can also be a space to negotiate and challenge homogenizing norms within queer communities, asserting individuality against expectations of how a “gay” identity should be performed or represented.48 The experience of mobility for queer individuals is further complicated by intersections with race, class, and gender identity/expression, creating unique challenges and possibilities related to safety, acceptance, and belonging in different spaces.40

Disability, Gender, and Accessible Adventures

Disability studies offers a critical lens on adventure narratives, highlighting the pervasive ableism within the genre.49 Science fiction and adventure stories frequently erase disabled bodies through futuristic cures or depict disability as something to be overcome, reinforcing the medical model and marginalizing disabled experiences.49 The very concept of “adventure,” often centered on conquering extreme physical challenges, implicitly assumes an able-bodied protagonist, rendering such narratives inaccessible or irrelevant to many disabled individuals.49 Disability intersects with gender to create specific barriers to mobility and participation. Environments themselves can be disabling when they lack accessibility.49 Emerging narratives written by disabled authors, such as those collected in Disabled People Destroy Science Fiction, actively challenge these tropes by centering disabled characters, exploring themes of accessibility, and envisioning futures built on community and interdependence rather than cures or exclusion.49 These narratives fundamentally redefine “adventure,” shifting the focus from overcoming physical limitations to navigating disabling environments or finding belonging in accessible communities.

Synthesis: Deconstructing Privilege

An intersectional analysis reveals that the “privilege of departure” is far from uniform, even among men. Race, class, sexuality, and ability intersect with gender to create a complex web of constraints and possibilities. The romanticized notion of freely “leaving it all behind” often masks the specific social, economic, and physical capital required to do so. Furthermore, the very definition of “adventure” appears implicitly classed and ableist, centered on narratives of physical conquest and leisure unavailable to many. Narratives emerging from marginalized perspectives—Black women travelers asserting agency against racism 41, queer individuals seeking refuge and identity 48, disabled authors envisioning accessible futures 49—force a reconceptualization of mobility, escape, and adventure itself. A comprehensive feminist analysis must move beyond a simple gender binary to acknowledge how other forms of privilege, such as whiteness and class, often underpin even those female adventure narratives celebrated as triumphs, recognizing the diverse realities faced by women situated at different intersections of identity.43

VII. Ethical Considerations and Care

The gendered nature of departure narratives raises profound ethical questions, particularly concerning the tension between individual freedom and responsibilities to others, especially within the context of care. The cultural tendency to valorize male quests for self-discovery through leaving, while simultaneously expecting women to remain anchored by caregiving duties, reveals a significant ethical double standard. Examining this tension through the lens of care ethics and existentialist feminist philosophy illuminates the moral complexities involved.

The Ethics of Care Framework

Care ethics, emerging significantly from feminist thought, offers a moral framework that contrasts sharply with traditional justice-based ethics (like Kantian deontology or utilitarianism).52 Where justice ethics often prioritizes abstract principles, impartiality, individual rights, and autonomy, care ethics emphasizes the concrete realities of human interdependence, vulnerability, and relationships.53 It values attentiveness to specific needs, contextual understanding, responsibility, and the maintenance of caring relationships as central moral concerns.1

A key contribution of feminist care ethics is its critique of the unequal social distribution of care labor.1 Historically and persistently, women have disproportionately shouldered the burdens of unpaid care for children, the elderly, and the household.2 This unequal distribution is often naturalized through cultural expectations, even in the absence of explicit obligation.1 Care ethicists argue that this gendering of care not only creates practical inequalities, limiting women’s opportunities for paid work or personal pursuits, but also reflects a societal devaluing of care itself.2 Some theorists highlight the concept of “privileged irresponsibility,” where dominant groups (often men) are implicitly excused from care work, allowing them greater freedom for other pursuits.55 Local care policies often reinforce this by emphasizing individual and familial responsibility for care, implicitly relying on traditional gender roles without explicitly addressing the gendered nature of care provision.55

Autonomy, Relationality, and Gendered Judgments

The narrative of “leaving it all behind” champions individual autonomy—the freedom to choose one’s own path. This clashes with the emphasis on relationality and responsibility central to care ethics. This tension is itself gendered. Feminist critics have noted that the very practice of care, as traditionally assigned to women, can undermine their personal and moral autonomy by encouraging excessive self-sacrifice, dependence on others’ approval, and neglect of their own needs and goals.56 Conversely, care ethicists critique the traditional philosophical ideal of autonomy as overly individualistic, disembodied, and detached, failing to reflect the reality of human lives lived in connection with others.56 This “double-edged autonomy critique” suggests the need for a conception of “relational autonomy” that recognizes both individual agency and embeddedness in relationships.56

Societal judgments surrounding departure often reflect this gendered tension. A man leaving responsibilities to “find himself” might be excused or even celebrated, framed within the heroic adventure narrative. A woman doing the same, especially leaving caregiving duties, is far more likely to face stigmatization and accusations of selfishness or abandonment.2 This double standard can be understood through Simone de Beauvoir’s existentialist feminist framework in The Second Sex. Beauvoir argues that society positions man as the Subject, associated with “transcendence”—active projection into the future, freedom, and projects—while woman is cast as the Other, relegated to “immanence”—stasis, the body, nature, maintenance, and repetition.59 From this perspective, a woman leaving domestic or care duties can be seen as rejecting her assigned immanence in pursuit of forbidden transcendence, thus violating deeply ingrained social expectations.59

Beauvoir’s concept of “bad faith”—a form of self-deception where individuals flee the anxiety of their freedom and responsibility by conforming to predetermined roles or denying their agency—adds another layer of ethical complexity.63 Women’s complicity in their own subordination, including adherence to traditional caregiving roles at the expense of their own projects, can sometimes be interpreted as a form of bad faith, an avoidance of the difficult work of claiming their own freedom and transcendence.64 However, this ethical critique must be balanced with a recognition of the powerful social, economic, and cultural structures that severely constrain women’s choices and make the exercise of freedom incredibly difficult.64 Complicity is not always a simple ethical failing but can be a complex response to a situation where options for authentic self-creation are limited.64

Towards Alternative Ethical Frameworks

Addressing the ethical double standard requires moving beyond gendered assumptions about who is naturally suited for care versus adventure. It necessitates recognizing the value of both autonomy and relational responsibility for all individuals, regardless of gender. This involves challenging the societal structures that disproportionately assign care burdens to women and promoting a more equitable distribution of these responsibilities.1 Furthermore, understanding responsibility not just as a task but as a potentially unavoidable response to the needs of others 1 complicates simple judgments about departure. It suggests that the decision to leave or stay involves navigating complex emotional and relational realities that transcend purely rational calculations of rights and duties. A truly ethical framework must acknowledge these complexities while striving for a social organization that allows both men and women the freedom to pursue self-discovery and projects without automatically sacrificing or being solely defined by their connections to others.

VIII. Contemporary Transformations

The twenty-first century has brought significant technological advancements, evolving social norms, and changing family structures that are reshaping the landscape of mobility, adventure, and gender roles. While new possibilities for departure and connection have emerged, these transformations are complex and often double-edged, creating new opportunities alongside novel forms of constraint and inequality.

Technological Impacts: Digital Mobility and Remote Work

Digital technologies have profoundly altered conceptions of mobility and escape. The internet, smartphones, and global connectivity enable forms of “imaginative” and “virtual” travel, allowing individuals to explore distant places and cultures without physical displacement.9 More tangibly, technology facilitates location-independent work, giving rise to phenomena like digital nomadism.45 Digital nomads embody a contemporary version of “leaving it all behind,” embracing a lifestyle characterized by continuous, often global, mobility driven by leisure and aesthetic considerations rather than work requirements.45 This lifestyle promises freedom from traditional work structures and geographic constraints.68

However, digital nomadism is far from a universally accessible or unequivocally liberating phenomenon. It is largely the domain of privileged individuals, often white Westerners, who leverage passport strength and income disparities to travel affordably, particularly in developing countries.44 This reproduces existing global inequalities and power imbalances.45 Critiques highlight the “digital bromad” stereotype—an advantaged, heterosexual white male—suggesting the persistence of gendered and racialized privilege within this supposedly liberated lifestyle.44 Experiences differ significantly based on gender and race, with non-Western women facing specific challenges like sexualization and racism.44 Furthermore, the neoliberal promise of freedom can mask precarious employment conditions and downward mobility.44

The broader shift towards remote work, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, also presents a mixed picture regarding gender and mobility. On one hand, remote work offers flexibility that can potentially benefit women juggling career and domestic responsibilities. Some research suggests women experience less everyday gender discrimination when working remotely compared to on-site, possibly due to the reduced salience of gender cues in virtual interactions.69 On the other hand, teleworking risks blurring the boundaries between paid work and private life, potentially intensifying conflicts, especially for women who still perform a larger share of unpaid household labor.70 The time saved from commuting may be absorbed by domestic tasks rather than personal pursuits, potentially reinforcing traditional gender roles despite the change in work location.70

Social Media: Performing Adventure and Authenticity

Social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok have become dominant arenas for representing and consuming narratives of travel, adventure, and lifestyle. Travel influencers, often ordinary individuals who build online followings based on perceived authenticity and expertise, significantly impact tourism decisions and shape aspirations.71 This influencer culture, however, is heavily gendered. Women constitute the vast majority of influencers, particularly in lifestyle, beauty, and travel sectors.75

Critical analyses reveal that influencer content often reproduces traditional gender stereotypes and conventional notions of femininity.77 Despite projecting images of empowerment and success, female influencers frequently adhere to narrow beauty standards (youth, thinness) and promote consumerism as a path to self-fulfillment.76 The performance of “authenticity”—sharing personal experiences, emotions, and vulnerabilities—is crucial for building trust and engagement but is also a form of calculated labor (“labor of authenticity”).80 This curated self-representation operates within a postfeminist sensibility, emphasizing individual choice, empowerment, and self-branding, often achieved through self-surveillance and bodily discipline.80 This focus on individual achievement and consumerist solutions can obscure persistent structural inequalities related to gender, race, and class, creating a potentially misleading picture of female liberation.76 The contemporary adventure, therefore, is increasingly mediated, performed, and commodified online, shifting focus from the journey itself to its curated representation, which carries its own gendered pressures and constraints.

Changing Family Structures and Persistent Norms

Significant shifts in family structures—including the decline of the traditional nuclear family, increased divorce rates, rising numbers of single-parent and dual-income households, the legalization of same-sex marriage, and evolving parenting roles like the “New Fatherhood”—are altering the context for gender roles and mobility.84 These changes theoretically create more flexibility and potentially challenge the rigid assignment of domestic responsibility primarily to women.85

However, evolving structures do not automatically erase deeply ingrained cultural norms. Despite women’s increased educational attainment and labor force participation, they continue to face significant inequalities in career advancement and bear a disproportionate burden of care work.2 Geographical mobility itself can reinforce gendered expectations, with men often moving for work while women’s mobility is shaped by family needs.84 External factors like climate change also disproportionately impact women, particularly in the Global South, limiting their mobility, increasing their care burdens, and exposing them to greater risks.86 The postfeminist emphasis on individual empowerment and choice, prevalent in media representations, often fails to acknowledge these persistent structural barriers, creating a disconnect between the idealized portrayal of female freedom and the complex realities faced by many women navigating contemporary work, family, and mobility landscapes.76

In synthesis, twenty-first-century transformations offer complex and often contradictory possibilities. Digital technologies enable new forms of mobility but also replicate and create new inequalities. Social media provides platforms for self-expression but often reinforces gender stereotypes through curated performances of authenticity within a postfeminist, consumerist framework. Changing family structures offer potential for more egalitarian roles, but traditional norms regarding care and responsibility remain remarkably resilient. The contemporary landscape of adventure and departure is thus one where new freedoms coexist with enduring and evolving forms of gendered constraint.

IX. Psychological Dimensions

Beyond the social, cultural, and ethical dimensions, understanding the persistent allure and gendered patterns of “leaving it all behind” requires exploring the underlying psychological functions that adventure and escape serve. Why do humans fantasize about or undertake such journeys, and how might these psychological needs and processes relate to identity formation and gender?

Psychological Functions: Growth, Mastery, and Escape

The desire to depart from the familiar often stems from fundamental psychological needs for growth, mastery, and novelty. Journeys into the unknown provide opportunities to challenge oneself, develop new skills, overcome obstacles, and experience the world in fresh ways. This aligns with Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which posits that intrinsic motivation and psychological well-being are fostered when basic needs for autonomy (feeling volitional and self-directed), competence (feeling effective and capable), and relatedness (feeling connected to others) are met.87 Adventure travel can potentially satisfy all three: autonomy in choosing one’s path and making decisions, competence gained through navigating challenges and acquiring skills, and relatedness forged through connections with fellow travelers, local communities, or even through the profound experience of solitude.88 Observed gender differences in motivation for activities like sports (e.g., men prioritizing social interaction or risk/adventure, women prioritizing health or aesthetics in some studies 87) might suggest different pathways through which these basic needs are pursued or expressed, potentially influenced by socialization.

Escape is another powerful motivator. Departure can serve as a way to cope with distress, trauma, boredom, or the perceived meaninglessness or constraints of everyday life.33 Existential psychology sheds light on this aspect, emphasizing the human confrontation with fundamental anxieties related to freedom, responsibility, isolation, meaninglessness, and death.89 From this perspective, “leaving it all behind” can be seen as an attempt to grapple with these existential givens. It might represent a flight from the overwhelming burden of freedom and responsibility 90, or conversely, a courageous attempt to confront meaninglessness and forge an authentic existence by breaking free from conformity and societal expectations (“bad faith”).93

Identity Formation, Self-Actualization, and Gender

Adolescence and emerging adulthood are key periods for identity formation, and participation in activities perceived as self-defining plays a crucial role in this process.95 Exploring interests, talents, and values through challenging activities helps individuals construct a sense of self.95 Adventure and risk-taking can provide potent contexts for such identity work, pushing boundaries and revealing capacities.

This links closely to the existential quest for authenticity and self-actualization—the drive to live in accordance with one’s true self and fulfill one’s potential.89 The departure narrative often frames the journey as a path toward discovering or becoming one’s “true” self, away from the distorting influences of society. However, this process is complicated by gender. Societal stereotypes and expectations can influence the types of activities deemed appropriate or accessible for self-definition by males versus females.95 Furthermore, as theoretical models suggest, gender stereotypes can become internalized through habit formation, shaping an individual’s sense of identity and influencing behavior even in the absence of external pressure.97

The psychological meaning of escape and the quest for authenticity may thus function differently across genders due to these internalized norms and differing societal constraints. For individuals socialized into masculine roles that may suppress emotional expression or demand conformity, escape might represent a flight towards a perceived freedom from constraint, albeit sometimes irresponsibly.90 For individuals socialized into feminine roles that emphasize relationality and potentially limit autonomy (Beauvoir’s immanence) 59, escape might be experienced as a necessary act of reclaiming agency and pursuing a forbidden transcendence—a flight towards authentic selfhood rather than simply away from responsibility.62 Yet, the very notion of a singular, “authentic” self discovered through adventure is complex. Identity is constantly negotiated, and the self discovered might still be shaped by the internalized ideals—including gendered ones—of the society one seeks to escape.59

Towards Equitable Fulfillment

Recognizing the psychological needs met by traditional adventure narratives—growth, autonomy, competence, meaning, authenticity—opens avenues for considering how these needs can be fulfilled in more equitable and diverse ways. If the classic “leaving it all behind” model is often predicated on masculine privilege and specific forms of physical or financial capital, alternative pathways to self-discovery and fulfillment are needed. These might include intellectual exploration, creative expression, deep engagement within one’s community, spiritual practices, or redefining “adventure” to encompass challenges and growth in less conventionally masculine domains, such as navigating complex relationships or contributing to social change. Creating more equitable possibilities requires challenging the gendered scripts that dictate whose journeys of self-discovery are culturally validated and supported.

X. Conclusion

This analysis has traced the pervasive and deeply gendered nature of the cultural narrative surrounding adventure and departure—the trope of “leaving it all behind.” Historically, this narrative has functioned as a form of masculine privilege, celebrating male mobility, transcendence, and escape from domestic responsibility, while simultaneously confining women to spheres of immanence, stasis, and care. From the epic voyages of Odysseus, predicated on Penelope’s steadfast immobility, through the hyper-masculine maritime world of Moby Dick, to the restless, female-shedding journeys of On the Road, a consistent pattern emerges where male freedom is defined against, and often requires, female constraint.

The examination of potential biological versus social factors contributing to gender differences in traits like risk-taking and sensation-seeking reveals a complex picture. While some moderate average differences exist, particularly in domains involving physical risk or disinhibition, the evidence strongly suggests that these are heavily modulated by social construction, gender stereotypes, and differential opportunities and evaluation systems, rather than being fixed biological imperatives. The critique of biological determinism underscores the dangers of essentializing gender and highlights the mutability of these behavioral patterns, as evidenced by the declining gender gap in thrill-seeking over recent decades.

In response to the male-dominated tradition, female-authored adventure narratives like Cheryl Strayed’s Wild and Robyn Davidson’s Tracks have emerged, reclaiming mobility and exploration for women. These narratives often reframe the journey, shifting the focus from external conquest to internal healing, self-discovery, and the challenging of societal gender norms. The very act of a woman undertaking a solo, arduous journey becomes a potent statement against patriarchal constraints, turning personal transformation into a political act. However, an intersectional perspective reveals that the privilege of departure is not monolithic; race, class, sexuality, and ability profoundly shape access to and experiences of mobility, demanding a more nuanced understanding that moves beyond a simple gender binary and acknowledges the specific privileges often underpinning even celebrated female adventures.

The ethical landscape surrounding departure is fraught with gendered double standards. Care ethics highlights the societal tendency to assign care responsibilities disproportionately to women, creating a conflict between the pursuit of individual autonomy (valorized in male departure) and the demands of relationality. Simone de Beauvoir’s existentialist feminist framework illuminates how women’s relegation to immanence makes their pursuit of transcendence through departure a transgression against prescribed roles, while the concept of bad faith adds complexity to understanding complicity within oppressive structures. Achieving ethical parity requires deconstructing these double standards and fostering social systems that value both autonomy and care equitably across genders.

Contemporary transformations driven by technology and shifting social norms present a paradoxical landscape. Digital nomadism and remote work offer new forms of mobility and potential flexibility but also risk reproducing and creating new inequalities along lines of gender, race, and class. Social media provides powerful platforms for representing adventure but often does so through a lens of postfeminist consumerism that emphasizes curated authenticity and individual empowerment while potentially obscuring persistent structural barriers. Evolving family structures coexist with resilient traditional expectations regarding gender roles and care.

Psychologically, the drive to “leave it all behind” taps into fundamental human needs for growth, autonomy, competence, and meaning, often intertwined with identity formation and the existential quest for authenticity. However, the meaning and function of escape appear to be gendered, shaped by differing societal constraints and internalized norms. The “authenticity” sought may itself be a complex construct influenced by these very norms.

In conclusion, while the narrative of adventure and departure holds universal appeal, its cultural expression and accessibility remain deeply marked by gender and intersecting inequalities. The historical privilege afforded to men to “leave it all behind” is being challenged, yet significant barriers and double standards persist, evolving in response to technological and social change. Achieving truly equitable freedom of movement and self-discovery requires ongoing critical engagement with these gendered scripts, a re-evaluation of the relationship between autonomy and care, and the creation of cultural and social structures that support diverse pathways to fulfillment for all individuals, regardless of gender or circumstance. Future research should continue to explore these dynamics, particularly focusing on diverse intersectional experiences across varied cultural contexts and the long-term impacts of contemporary shifts in work, technology, and social connection on gendered mobility and identity. Ultimately, transforming the cultural narrative necessitates not only challenging limitations on female mobility but also reimagining the very meaning of adventure, responsibility, and a well-lived life beyond restrictive gender binaries.

Referências citadas

1. Me? The invisible call of responsibility and its promise for care ethics: a phenomenological view - PubMed Central, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6499747/
2. Burden and Gender inequalities around Informal Care - PMC - PubMed Central, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7871478/
3. www.tuwien.at, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.tuwien.at/fileadmin/Assets/dienstleister/abteilung_genderkompetenz/gender_in_der_Forschung/GEECCO_Results/Additional_resources_and_literature_reviews/GEECCO_WP6_Literature_Review_Gender_and_Mobility.pdf
4. Full article: Gender and mobility: new approaches for informing …, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09663690903498225
5. A Geocritical Perspective on the Female Fantastic … - Purdue e-Pubs, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3689&context=clcweb
6. Female Gothic and the Domestic Space: The Downfall of Women and the Transgression of Social Expectations in Charlotte Perkins Gilman - Repositorio Académico - Universidad de Chile, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://repositorio.uchile.cl/bitstream/handle/2250/186438/Female-gothic-and-the-domestic-space.pdf?sequence=1
7. Keywords of Mobility - Lirias, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/396373
8. Keywords of Mobility - Berghahn Books, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.berghahnbooks.com/downloads/intros/SalazarKeywords_intro.pdf
9. libanswers.unomaha.edu, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://libanswers.unomaha.edu/loader?fid=1908&type=1&key=e0e50d20dfbada21f6ffd89531b7eb74
10. www.amherst.edu, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.amherst.edu/system/files/media/1498/Handout.pdf
11. www.agathos-international-review.com, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.agathos-international-review.com/issues/2024/28/Baysal.pdf
12. Feminist Retelling of a Greek Myth: Reclaiming the Voice of Penelope, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.inprogress.uni-hannover.de/fileadmin/inprogress/Materials_Issue_1/Section1_Academic_Papers/In_Progress_1.1_AS_Plass_01.pdf
13. Homer’s Dream Guy: An Exploration of Masculinity and Honor in the Odyssey - DigitalCommons@Macalester College, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043&context=classicsjournal
14. Penelope’s Wonder: Navigating the Mythos of Masculinity | Stanford …, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://shc.stanford.edu/arcade/interventions/penelopes-wonder-navigating-mythos-masculinity-1
15. Tied By Cords Woven of Heart-Strings: A Study of Manhood in Herman Melville’s Moby Dick, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.bu.edu/writingprogram/journal/past-issues/issue-2/faller/
16. Melville and the Architecture of Antebellum Masculinity, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249872978_Melville_and_the_Architecture_of_Antebellum_Masculinity
17. Oğuzhan Ayrım, American Adam Myth and Ahab: Sartre’s Masculine Principles in Herman Melville’s “Moby Dick” - PhilArchive, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://philarchive.org/rec/AYRAAM
18. repository.essex.ac.uk, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://repository.essex.ac.uk/19767/1/A%20Specific%20Elsewhere%20-%20Locating%20Masculinity%20in%20Jack%20Kerouac’s%20On%20The%20Road.pdf
19. Jack Kerouac, On the Road - John Pistelli, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://johnpistelli.com/2018/01/10/jack-kerouac-on-the-road/
20. Women Writers in the Beat Generation - LIBER: A Feminist Review, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.liberreview.com/issue-1-2-women-writers/
21. Re-Visioning Patriarchy Through the Lens of Homer’s Odyssey by Michael Bogar - Pacifica Graduate Institute, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.pacifica.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/bogar_m.pdf
22. Sex differences in sensation-seeking: a meta-analysis - PMC, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3757272/
23. The impact of sex hormone concentrations on decision-making in females and males - PMC, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4220662/
24. ferrer_lerner_et_al_anger_and_r… - Scholars at Harvard, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/jenniferlerner/files/ferrer_lerner_et_al_anger_and_risk_behavior_5-23-16.docx
25. Daring Differently: Gender Differences in Risk-Taking Behavior - Neuroscience News, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://neurosciencenews.com/gender-risk-taking-23431/
26. Gender and Mathematical Ability: The Toll of … - Monthly Review, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://monthlyreview.org/2007/11/01/gender-and-mathematical-ability-the-toll-of-biological-determinism/
27. The Case Against Behavior Genetics: Review of Panofsky, A. (2014). Misbehaving Science: Controversy and the Development of Behav, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.wichita.edu/academics/fairmount_college_of_liberal_arts_and_sciences/psychology/documents/MisbehavingScienceReview.pdf
28. (PDF) Biological determinism - ResearchGate, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318921355_Biological_determinism
29. The Biological Contributions to Gender Identity and Gender Diversity: Bringing Data to the Table - PubMed, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29460079/
30. The Power In Demography: Women’s Social Constructions Of Gender Identity At Work, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/256740
31. Gender as a social and structural variable: research perspectives from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) - Oxford Academic, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/tbm/article/14/1/13/7130278
32. (PDF) Gender Stereotypes, Risk-Taking, and Gendered Mobility, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305315296_Gender_Stereotypes_Risk-Taking_and_Gendered_Mobility
33. Book Review: Wild by Cheryl Strayed - Athena Mellor, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://athenamellor.com/blog/book-review/wild-cheryl-strayed
34. “Walking Your Way out of the Woods : An Analysis of Cheryl …, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://dial.uclouvain.be/downloader/downloader.php?pid=thesis%3A11074&datastream=PDF_01
35. The Hidden Scopophilia in Wild (2014) and Its Contribution to Feminist Road Film, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.ewadirect.com/proceedings/chr/article/view/16052
36. Tracks: A Woman’s Solo Trek Across 1700 Miles of Australian Outback - LitCharts, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.litcharts.com/lit/tracks-a-woman-s-solo-trek-across-1700-miles-of-australian-outback
37. Tracks and Into The Wild | Lisa’s Study Guides, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.vcestudyguides.com/blog/reading-and-comparing-tracks-into-the-wild
38. Femininity and Society Theme in Tracks: A Woman’s Solo Trek Across 1700 Miles of Australian Outback | LitCharts, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.litcharts.com/lit/tracks-a-woman-s-solo-trek-across-1700-miles-of-australian-outback/themes/femininity-and-society
39. (PDF) Intersectionality of Gender, Race, Class, Sexuality, Disability and Other Social Identities in Shaping the Experiences and Opportunities of Marginalized Groups in Ukraine - ResearchGate, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378537068_Intersectionality_of_Gender_Race_Class_Sexuality_Disability_and_Other_Social_Identities_in_Shaping_the_Experiences_and_Opportunities_of_Marginalized_Groups_in_Ukraine
40. Intersectionality of Gender, Race, Class, Sexuality, Disability and Other Social Identities in Shaping the Experiences and Opportunities of Marginalized Groups in Ukraine - IPRJB, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJGS/article/view/2357
41. “Bantu women on the move”: Black women and the politics of …, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0018-229X2018000100005
42. African American Travel Writing and the Politics of MobilityThe Narrative of Nancy Prince, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249767089_African_American_Travel_Writing_and_the_Politics_of_MobilityThe_Narrative_of_Nancy_Prince
43. TOWARDS A FEMINIST POLITICS OF MOBILITY: US TRAVEL AND IMMIGRATION MEMOIRS | Feminismo/s, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://feminismos.ua.es/article/view/2020-n36-towards-a-feminist-politics-of-mobility-us-travel-and-i/pdf
44. munin.uit.no, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/34910/article.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
45. Chapter 7: Digital Nomads: A New Form of Leisure Class? - Durham Research Online (DRO), acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/1626290
46. The intersection of gender, race, disability, and class - UNI ScholarWorks, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://scholarworks.uni.edu/context/etd/article/1327/viewcontent/Amy_Petersen_dissertation_Redacted.pdf
47. Communicating Queer Identities Through Personal Narrative and Intersectional Reflexivity - Digital Commons @ DU, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1834&context=etd
48. iisjoa.org, acessado em maio 3, 2025, http://iisjoa.org/sites/default/files/iisjoa/March%202022/9.pdf
49. Imagining Accessibility: Theorizing Disability in Disabled People …, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/6685/5709
50. The Politics of Di/visibility: Narrative Positioning and Disability Representation in Children’s Literature - ISU ReD, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2447&context=etd
51. An Accessibility Adventure: Teaching and Learning Exhibition Design Through the Lens of Disability Studies - ResearchGate, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271850222_An_Accessibility_Adventure_Teaching_and_Learning_Exhibition_Design_Through_the_Lens_of_Disability_Studies
52. FEMINIST ETHICS OF CARE AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR SOME NORMATIVE QUESTIONS IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS - DergiPark, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/804464
53. Care Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/care-ethics/
54. Feminism and Feminist Ethics – Introduction to Philosophy - Rebus Press, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-ethics/chapter/feminism-and-feminist-ethics/
55. Dividing Responsibility for Care: Tracing the Ethics of Care in Local …, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-policy-and-society/article/dividing-responsibility-for-care-tracing-the-ethics-of-care-in-local-care-strategies/6E97EC10A61898D1D03217F07E518C24
56. uwethicsofcare.gws.wisc.edu, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://uwethicsofcare.gws.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Keller-J.-1997.pdf
57. Clement-Care-Autonomy-and-Justice.pdf, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://uwethicsofcare.gws.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Clement-Care-Autonomy-and-Justice.pdf
58. Gender differences in caregiving among family - caregivers of people with mental illnesses, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4804270/
59. The Second Sex | Issue 69 - Philosophy Now, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://philosophynow.org/issues/69/The_Second_Sex
60. Simone de Beauvoir’s Transcendence and Immanence in the Twenty First century: The Tension between Career and Motherhood Jennif, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://journals.sfu.ca/wt/index.php/westerntributaries/article/download/12/5
61. The Second Sex: Themes - Simone de Beauvoir - SparkNotes, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/secondsex/themes/
62. The second sex: from the oppressed immanence to the search for transcendence. Thinking. BeBrave. School de Philosophy y Letras. University of Navarra., acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://en.unav.edu/web/bebrave/think/el-segundo-sexo-de-la-oprimida-inmanencia-a-la-busqueda-de-la-trascendencia
63. Beyond the Second Sex: The Ongoing Relevance of Beauvoir’s Existentialism in Today’s Gender Norms. - IJNRD, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2412081.pdf
64. Criticizing Women: Simone de Beauvoir on Complicity and Bad Faith - PhilArchive, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://philarchive.org/archive/MELCWS
65. Sartre and Beauvoir on Women’s Psychological Oppression - Accepted vers. for Sharing.pdf - -ORCA - Cardiff University, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/161725/1/Sartre%20and%20Beauvoir%20on%20Women%27s%20Psychological%20Oppression%20-%20Accepted%20vers.%20for%20Sharing.pdf
66. Chapter 4: Bad Faith and de Beauvoir’s Gendered Self | Brian Sawyer, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://briansawyer.net/2003/11/20/chapter-4-bad-faith-and-de-beauvoirs-gendered-self/
67. Simone de Beauvoir - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/beauvoir/
68. Conceptualising ‘meta-work’in the context of continuous, global mobility: The case of digital nomadism, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/document/2501189
69. Location Matters: Everyday Gender Discrimination in Remote and On-site Work | Organization Science - PubsOnLine, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2022.16949
70. Investigation into Teleworking and its Relationships with Gender, Mobility, and Paid-Work-Life Balance - ResearchGate, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390801505_Investigation_into_Teleworking_and_its_Relationships_with_Gender_Mobility_and_Paid-Work-Life_Balance
71. Investigating Social Media Influencers’ Impact on Travel Decisions: A Data-Driven Study, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202411.1649/v1
72. Full article: Travel influencers and their social identity: a phenomenological approach, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13683500.2024.2419554
73. Exploring the Characteristics and Extent of Travel Influencers’ Impact on Generation Z Tourist Decisions - MDPI, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/66
74. TRAVEL INFLUENCERS DOMINATING THE WORLD OF MARKETING: THE ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL MEDIA ENGAGEMENT - SUU, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.suu.edu/hss/comm/masters/capstone/project/smith-p.pdf
75. Gender effects in influencer marketing: an experimental study on the efficacy of endorsements by same- vs. other-gender social media influencers on Instagram | Request PDF - ResearchGate, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356247510_Gender_effects_in_influencer_marketing_an_experimental_study_on_the_efficacy_of_endorsements_by_same-_vs_other-gender_social_media_influencers_on_Instagram
76. “Girl Power, Selfies, and Sexiness”: An Investigation into the Neoliberal and Postfeminist Era of Influencer Marketing, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6386&context=gc_etds
77. Gender Incongruence in Influencer Marketing: Navigating Gender Dynamics s Nina Denise Deckert - bwl.uni-mannheim.de, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.bwl.uni-mannheim.de/media/Lehrstuehle/bwl/Stahl/mastersthesis/MasterSeminarThesis_NDeckert_0325.pdf
78. Informal Learning with a Gender Perspective Transmitted by Influencers through Content on YouTube and Instagram in Spain - MDPI, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/8/341
79. THE PATRIARCHY BECOMES THAT GIRL: TIKTOK AND THE MEDIATIZATION OF HEGEMONIC FEMININITY - CSUSB ScholarWorks, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2878&context=etd
80. “Celebrate your bloom story”: An Automedia Analysis of Social Media Influencers, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://stream.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/index.php/stream/article/download/263/217
81. Gender, Social Media, and the Labor of Authenticity - ResearchGate, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350623566_Gender_Social_Media_and_the_Labor_of_Authenticity
82. Full article: “Oh how I love being a woman”: post-feminism and contemporary femininity on TikTok - Taylor & Francis Online, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14680777.2024.2442997?src=
83. POSTFEMINISM & THE EXTRA MILE: MEDIA REPRESENTATION OF GENDER AND ATHLETIC IDENTITY IN WOMEN’S DISTANCE RUNNING by CAELA G - Scholars’ Bank, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/bitstreams/44665e78-3ebe-4db9-9d9d-28848362175e/download
84. The Influence Of Geographical Mobility On Gender Roles - FasterCapital, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://fastercapital.com/topics/the-influence-of-geographical-mobility-on-gender-roles.html
85. Changing gender roles and family structures | Sociology of Marriage and the Family Class Notes | Fiveable, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/sociology-marriage-family/unit-5/changing-gender-roles-family-structures/study-guide/ghuT5Cfeju5iqWl4
86. How gender inequality and climate change are interconnected | UN Women – Headquarters, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/explainer/how-gender-inequality-and-climate-change-are-interconnected
87. Exploratory Study on Motivational Factors in Recreational Sports: A …, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://opensportssciencesjournal.com/VOLUME/18/ELOCATOR/e1875399X354776/FULLTEXT/
88. Self-Determination Theory: How It Explains Motivation - Verywell Mind, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-determination-theory-2795387
89. Existential Guilt and the Fear of Death - PMC - PubMed Central, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5597483/
90. Chapter 11: Rollo May - Existential Psychology Flashcards - Quizlet, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://quizlet.com/ca/144100764/chapter-11-rollo-may-existential-psychology-flash-cards/
91. Key Existential Concerns, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.issep.org/key-existential-concerns
92. Freedom, Responsibility, and Agency - Existential Therapy, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://existential-therapy.com/freedom-responsibility-and-agency/
93. The Essence of Freedom: An Existential Perspective on Human Liberation - SWEET INSTITUTE - Continuing Education for Mental Health Professionals, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://sweetinstitute.com/the-essence-of-freedom-an-existential-perspective-on-human-liberation/
94. Existentialism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/existentialism/
95. Gender differences in the self-defining activities and identity experiences of adolescents and emerging adults - PubMed, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16600358/
96. The effectiveness of existential psychotherapy on attitude to life and self-flourishing of educated women homemakers - PMC, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6905282/
97. www.aeaweb.org, acessado em maio 3, 2025, https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2019/preliminary/paper/27Gyf8zB